Panelists discuss how understanding the stages of type 1 diabetes (T1D) progression is crucial for early intervention, with a focus on delaying disease advancement through proactive treatments like teplizumab.
The following transcript has been edited for clarity and length.
Javier Morales, MD: Let me pose a question to our audience: Are you aware that type 1 diabetes progresses through distinct stages? Based on the responses, about two-thirds of our audience recognizes that type 1 diabetes progresses in stages. Now, here's a follow-up question: If you were asked to define these stages, how confident are you in your ability to do so? Kindly select the option that best reflects your confidence level.
The results show that the majority of the audience is somewhat confident, while about a third feel very confident in their understanding. Without further ado, let’s dive into these stages. Natalie, could you guide us through them?
Natalie Bellini, DNP, FNP-BC, BC-ADM, CDCES: Absolutely. The concept of staging type 1 diabetes was first introduced in Diabetes Care back in 2015. Before that, we thought of type 1 diabetes as binary—you either had it or you didn’t. Most patients were diagnosed only after entering full-blown diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and requiring insulin, with little attention to earlier stages or interventions.
The science has since evolved, thanks in part to NIH-funded studies like the Diabetes Prevention Trial 1 (DPT-1), which led to TrialNet. These studies focused on first-degree relatives of patients with type 1 diabetes, who have up to a 15-fold increased risk compared to the general population. As a result, we now understand that type 1 diabetes progresses through three distinct stages, each with corresponding ICD-10 codes. Let’s review them.
It’s fascinating to note that the introduction of staging has not only enhanced our understanding of type 1 diabetes but has also informed screening and preventive strategies. By identifying patients in stage 1 or 2, we can intervene earlier and potentially reduce the risk of DKA at diagnosis, which, as we’ve seen, has a profound impact on patient outcomes.
Morales: Thank you, Natalie. It’s remarkable how this framework has reshaped our approach to type 1 diabetes. Recognizing these stages opens the door to earlier interventions and better outcomes, and I’m eager to hear more about the implications for screening and treatment.