Preoperative Evaluation: How to Identify Patients at Risk for Complications Caused by Diabetes, COPD, and Other Medical Conditions

Article

In patients with underlying disease, a preoperative evaluation and targeted perioperative management strategies can minimize surgical complications and maximize healing. This article focuses on how to identify surgery patients at risk for complications caused by diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and other medical conditions; I also describe strategies to minimize such risk.

In patients with underlying disease, a preoperative evaluation and targeted perioperative management strategies can minimize surgical complications and maximize healing. In my article on page 1296, I discussed interventions that can reduce the risk of perioperative cardiac mortality and morbidity. Here I focus on how to identify surgery patients at risk for complications caused by diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and other medical conditions; I also describe strategies to minimize such risk.

Note that preoperative testing in apparently healthy persons is likely to produce little, if any, benefit. A systematic review found that results of routine chest radiographs, ECGs, complete blood cell counts, tests of hemostasis and biochemistry, and urinalysis led to a management change in fewer than 3% of patients.1

GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS

Maintenance of normothermia may reduce the risk of postoperative infection. A randomized trial of maintaining normothermia was stopped halfway through the protocol because of the dramatic decrease in wound infections and the concomitant decrease in hospital days, days to solid food, and days to suture removal in those patients in whom normothermia was maintained.2

The practice of requiring an 8- to 12-hour preoperative NPO fast may be coming to an end. A recent study now recommends free intake of clear fluids up to 2 hours before anesthesia and suggests that a preoperative carbohydrate-rich beverage may reduce postoperative insulin resistance and improve recovery.3

DIABETES MELLITUS

Diabetes is a risk factor for vascular, infectious, and wound-related postoperative complications.4,5 In addition, patients with diabetes are at higher risk for perioperative metabolic decompensation because of alterations in their glycemic control regimen and because of the stress of surgery itself.

Advantages of tight glucose control. Hyperglycemia has a detrimental effect on white blood cell and immunoglobulin function. Recent studies of tight glucose control in hospitalized patients have shown improved outcomes for those who have sustained an acute myocardial infarction, those who are critically ill, and those undergoing cardiac surgery.6-13 Despite the lack of direct evidence, it seems reasonable to extrapolate these findings to patients with diabetes who are undergoing any surgical procedure. Guidelines for perioperative glycemic control were recently published by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. These recommend a target blood glucose level of 110 mg/dL for patients in the ICU, and a preprandial target of 110 mg/dL and a postprandial target of 180 mg/dL for patients in non-critical care units.14

How to achieve good control. To attain tight glycemic control in the perioperative period, insulin therapy is frequently needed, often as a continuous infusion. Guidelines from the American College of Endocrinology recommend insulin infusions for patients who must fast for a prolonged period (more than 12 hours), critically ill patients, and patients undergoing major surgical procedures.14 Insulin infusions are safe and effective as long as the patient's glucose level is sufficiently high to prevent starvation ketosis and hypoglycemia. Between 5 and 10 g/h of a 5% dextrose infusion is usually adequate. Check glucose levels hourly until they stabilize.

Standard orders for insulin infusion can be helpful for both the physician and the nursing staff. Insulin infusion protocols need to be easy to follow, safe, and conducive to the quick achievement of target goals. One example of an insulin infusion protocol is shown in the Box.

Maintaining control postoperatively. When helping a patient make the transition to subcutaneous insulin therapy, keep the glucose level at goal. To do this, give a dose of short-acting or rapid-acting insulin 1 to 2 hours before you stop the insulin infusion. Basal and prandial insulin doses are titrated to the patient's needs. To determine a patient's 24-hour insulin requirement, calculate the average hourly insulin dose required over the previous 6 to 8 hours (provided the blood glucose was at target and the insulin dose was stable). Multiply this average hourly dose by 24 to determine the daily insulin requirement. Give half this amount as intermediate-acting or long-acting insulin for basal coverage and half as short-acting or rapid-acting insulin in divided doses before meals.15 Further adjustments to the insulin dose may be needed to compensate for changes in stress level, oral intake, intravenous or enteral alimentation, weight, insulin sensitivity, medications, and other factors.

PULMONARY DISEASE

Strategies that can help reduce postoperative pulmonary complications are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 — Strategies to reduce the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications

Encourage cessation of smoking at least 8 weeks before surgery
Treat airflow obstruction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma
Administer antibiotics and delay surgery if respiratory infection is present
Begin patient education regarding lung expansion maneuvers

Patient-related risk factors. The best way to determine a patient's risk of postoperative pulmonary complications is to perform a careful history taking and physical examination.16 Be alert for a history of exercise intolerance, chronic cough, or unexplained dyspnea. During the examination, look for decreased breath sounds, dullness to percussion, wheezes, coarse crackles, and a prolonged expiratory phase. All these are associated with an increased risk of pulmonary complications.17

Reserve preoperative pulmonary function testing for patients undergoing lung resection; such testing has not been shown to be predictive of pulmonary complications in studies of other procedures.17-19 Arterial blood gas analysis is not indicated as part of the routine preoperative evaluation of patients with a preexisting lung condition.

Smoking. This risk factor is associated with an increased likelihood of postoperative complications even in persons without lung disease. The relative risk of pulmonary complications for smokers ranges from 1.4 to 4.3. To lessen the risk, the patient must stop smoking at least 8 weeks before surgery.20

COPD. This disorder also increases the risk of pulmonary complications; the relative risk ranges from 2.7 to 4.7. Patients with COPD whose symptoms are not well controlled preoperatively, who have signs of airflow obstruction, or whose exercise capacity is suboptimal require aggressive preoperative treatment. Combination therapy is best. Baseline treatment consists of regular use of inhaled ipratropium, with inhaled b2-agonists added up to 4 times a day as needed to control symptoms. For patients who continue to have symptoms despite bronchodilator therapy or who are not at their personal baseline level of symptoms, a 2-week preoperative course of systemic corticosteroids is reasonable.21 Reserve preoperative antibiotics for patients in whom a change in the character or amount of sputum suggests infection.

Asthma. The results of studies of asthma's association with postoperative complications have been mixed. Nonetheless, before surgery it is reasonable to strive to have patients free of wheezing, with a peak expiratory flow of greater than 80% of their personal best value.22

Procedure-related risk. Certain attributes of a planned procedure can also predict increased risk of pulmonary complications. Risk increases as the incision approaches the diaphragm; upper abdominal and thoracic surgery poses the highest risk of postoperative complications.

Postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing abdominal surgery can increase the hospital stay by 1 to 2 weeks.17 However, pulmonary complications from surgery outside the thorax or abdomen are rare, and the risk associated with laparoscopic abdominal surgery is much less than that associated with open procedures. Procedures that last longer than 3 hours also have a higher risk of complications.16 In patients who are at high risk for pulmonary complications, consider using shorter procedures.

Epidural, spinal, and regional forms of anesthesia are associated with fewer pulmonary complications than is general anesthesia.16,23,24 Consider using the former whenever this is possible.

ADRENAL INSUFFICIENCY

Suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is a common consequence of glucocorticoid therapy. Overt secondary adrenal insufficiency, which can be precipitated by surgery in a patient with HPA suppression, is a rare but life-threatening condition. The ability to diagnose HPA suppression depends on the detection of plasma cortisol levels that are inappropriately low for the clinical situation. Any patient who has received a glucocorticoid in a dosage equivalent to 20 mg/d (or more) of prednisone for more than 5 days is at risk for HPA suppression. Recovery from short courses (5 days) occurs rapidly--within 5 days. However, patients who have been exposed to high doses of glucocorticoids for prolonged periods may take up to 1 year to recover their adrenal function. The standard short adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation test can be used to assess adrenocortical function before surgery.25 Increased perioperative "stress" dosing is recommended for patients at risk for adrenal insufficiency. Appropriate dosages for various types of procedures and baseline glucocorticoid requirements are shown in Table 2.26

Table 2 — Recommendations for perioperative glucocorticoids

Surgical Stress
Physiologic need (hydrocortisone equivalent)
Additional glucocorticoid dosage (hydrocortisone)

Minor (eg, hernia)

25 mg/d
25 mg preoperatively

Moderate (eg, TAH)
50 - 75 mg/d for 2 days
20 mg q8h for 2 days

Major (eg, CABG Whipple operation)
100 - 150 mg/d for 2 - 3 days
25- 50 mg q8h for 2 days

THROMBOTIC DISEASE

The rationale for interventions to prevent thrombotic disease in perioperative patients has 3 aspects. First, there is a high prevalence of venous thromboembolism in perioperative patients because of the increased risk of venous stasis in this setting. The prevalence of deep venous thrombosis is between 15% and 40% in patients undergoing most types of surgery, and it increases to 40% to 60% in patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty or hip fracture surgery. Often, these occurrences are clinically silent. Second, the adverse consequences of venous thromboembolism are significant; they include pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, and post-thrombotic syndromes. Third, thromboprophylaxis is effective at preventing deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Studies have shown it to be cost-effective as well.27

Patients can be assigned to 1 of 4 risk categories based on their age, the presence of risk factors, and the type of surgery planned. Recommendations for thromboprophylaxis for patients in each of these risk categories are listed in Table 3.

Table 3 — Recommendations for thromboprophylaxis

Risk
Recommendations

Low—minor surgery in patients
aged < 40 y with no risk factors*

Early mobilization

Medium—minor surgery in patients aged 40 - 60 y and in those with risk factors,* major surgery in patients aged < 40 y with no risk factors*
LDUH 5000 U bid or LMWH

Higher risk—minor surgery in patients aged > 60 y, major surgery in patients aged > 40 y with risk factors*
LDUH 5000 U tid or LMWH

Highest risk—major surgery in patients aged > 60 y and/or with risk factors*
LDUH 5000 U tid + GCS or IPC or LMWH

POSTOPERATIVE DELIRIUM IN ELDERLY PATIENTS

Postoperative delirium, characterized by incoherent speech and thought, disorientation, and impaired memory and attention, has been reported in 5.1% to 61.3% of older patients after surgery.28 The condition is considered reversible, since only 1% of patients have persistent cognitive dysfunction 1 to 2 years after surgery. Preoperative risk factors that can contribute to postoperative delirium include advanced age, low educational level, polypharmacy, alcohol and sedative withdrawal, impaired vision and hearing, sleep deficiency, anxiety, depression, and dementia.29 Other important risk factors include the use of physical restraints, malnutrition, more than 3 new medications, and the use of a bladder catheter.30

Correct risk factors preoperatively whenever possible, and be alert for early signs of delirium during the postoperative period. Ambulatory surgery is preferable because the duration of the procedure is shorter and the patient can recover in a familiar home environment. Avoid medications such as meperidine, benzodiazepines, and anticholinergic agents; these agents have been associated with an increased risk of postoperative delirium.31 Patients at high risk may also be assessed before and after surgery with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) to measure changes in baseline cognitive function.

If delirium occurs, search for common postoperative complications, such as pneumonia, urinary tract infection, fluid imbalance, or electrolyte disorders; these are frequent causes of postoperative delirium. After the cause has been identified and treated, the preferred approach for treating delirium is oral haloperidol, 0.25 to 2 mg 1 to 2 hours before bedtime.28

References:

REFERENCES:

1.

Munro J, Booth A, Nicholl J. Routine preoperative testing: a systematic review of the evidence.

Health Technol Assess

. 1997;1:1-63.

2.

Kurz A, Sessler DI, Lenhardt R. Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospitalization. Study of Wound Infection and Temperature Group.

N Engl J Med

. 1996;334:1209-1215.

3.

Ljungqvist O, Soreide E. Preoperative fasting.

Br J Surg

. 2003;90:400-406.

4.

Stagnaro-Green A. Perioperative glucose control: does it really matter?

Mt Sinai J Med

. 1991;58: 299-304.

5.

Vannini P, Ciavarella A, Olmi R, et al. Diabetes as pro-infective risk factor in total hip replacement.

Acta Diabetol

. 1984;21:275-280.

6.

Capes SE, Hunt D, Malmberg K, Gerstein HC. Stress hyperglycemia and increased risk of death after myocardial infarction in patients with and without diabetes: a systematic overview.

Lancet

. 2000;355: 773-778.

7.

Malmberg K, Ryden L, Efendic S, et al. Randomized trial of insulin-glucose infusion followed by subcutaneous insulin treatment in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction (DIGAMI study): effects on mortality at 1 year.

J Am Coll Cardiol

. 1995;26: 57-65.

8.

van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill patients.

N Engl J Med

. 2001;345:1359-1367.

9.

Krinsley JS. Association between hyperglycemia and increased hospital mortality in a heterogeneous population of critically ill patients.

Mayo Clin Proc

. 2003;78:1471-1478.

10.

Krinsly JS. Effect of an intensive glucose management protocol on the mortality of critically ill adult patients.

Mayo Clin Proc

. 2004;79:992-1000.

11.

Golden SH, Peart-Vigilance C, Kao WH, Brancati FL. Perioperative glycemic control and the risk of infectious complications in a cohort of adults with diabetes.

Diabetes Care

. 1999;22:1408-1414.

12.

Furnary AP, Zerr KJ, Grunkmeier GL, Staff A. Continuous intravenous insulin infusion reduces the incidence of deep sternal wound infection in diabetic patients after cardiac surgical procedures.

Ann Thorac Surg

. 1999;67:352-360.

13.

Lazar HL, Chipkin SR, Fitzgerald CA, et al. Tight glycemic control in diabetic coronary artery bypass graft patients improves perioperative outcomes and decreases recurrent ischemic events.

Circulation

. 2004;109:1497-1502.

14.

Garber AJ, Moghissi ES, Bransome ED Jr, et al. American College of Endocrinology position statement on inpatient diabetes and metabolic control.

Endocr Pract

. 2004;10:77-82.

15.

Moghissi E. Hospital management of diabetes: beyond the sliding scale.

Cleve Clin J Med

. 2004;71: 801-808.

16.

Smetana GW. Preoperative pulmonary evaluation.

N Engl J Med

. 1999;340:937-944.

17.

Lawrence VA, Dhanda R, Hilsenbeck SG, Page CP. Risk of pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery.

Chest

. 1996;110:744-750.

18.

Gass GD, Olsen GN. Preoperative pulmonary function testing to predict postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Chest

. 1986;89:127-135.

19.

Lawrence VA, Page CP, Harris GD. Preoperative spirometry before abdominal operations. A critical appraisal of its predictive value.

Arch Intern Med

. 1989;149:280-285.

20.

Warner MA, Offord KP, Warner ME, et al. Role of preoperative cessation of smoking and other factors in postoperative pulmonary complications: a blinded prospective study of coronary artery bypass patients.

Mayo Clin Proc

. 1989;64:609-616.

21.

Mendella LA, Manfreda J, Warren CP, Anthonisen NR. Steroid response in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Ann Intern Med

. 1982;96: 17-21.

22.

Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. National Asthma Education Program. Expert Panel Report.

J Allergy Clin Immunol

. 1991;88 (3 pt 2):425-434.

23.

Ganapathy S, Buckley DN. Best evidence in anesthetic practice. Prevention: intraoperative neuraxial blockade reduces some postoperative complications.

Can J Anaesth

. 2001;48:990-992.

24.

Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, et al. Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidu-ral or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials.

BMJ

. 2000;321:1493.

25.

Axelrod L. Perioperative management of patients treated with glucocorticoids.

Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am

. 2003;32:367-383.

26.

Salem M, Tainsh RE Jr, Bromberg J, et al. Perioperative glucocorticoid coverage. A reassessment 42 years after emergence of a problem.

Ann Surg

. 1994;219:416-425.

27.

Geerts WH, Pineo GF, Heit JA, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy.

Chest

. 2004;126(3 suppl):338S-400S.

28.

Jin F, Chung F. Minimizing perioperative adverse events in the elderly.

Br J Anaesth

. 2001;87: 608-624.

29.

Abildstrom H, Rasmussen LS, Rentowl P, et al. Cognitive dysfunction 1-2 years after non-cardiac surgery in the elderly. ISPOCD group. International Study of Post-Operative Cognitive Dysfunction.

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand

. 2000;44:1246-1251.

30.

Inouye SK, Charpentier PA. Precipitating factors for delirium in hospitalized elderly persons. Predictive model and interrelationship with baseline vulnerability.

JAMA

. 1996;275:852-857.

31.

Marcantonio ER, Juarez G, Goldman L, et al. The relationship of postoperative delirium with psychoactive medications.

JAMA

. 1994;272:1518-1522.

32.

Trence DL, Kelly JL, Hirsch IB. The rationale and management of hyperglycemia for in-patients with cardiovascular disease: time for change.

J Clin Endocrinol Metab

. 2003;88:2430-2437.

Recent Videos
New Research Amplifies Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Cardiometabolic Measures Over Time
Tezepelumab Significantly Reduced Exacerbations in Patients with Severe Asthma, Respiratory Comorbidities
Overweight and Obesity: One Expert's 3 Wishes for the Future of Patient Care
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.