The title of this column is the slogan from World AIDS Day 2006, and as we look to 2007 and a new Congress, a more appropriate slogan could not have been chosen. However, rather than keeping the promise, we are only slightly farther ahead than we were 1, 5, 10, or even 20 years ago and at some risk of going backward, as evinced by the sobering information made available through the World Health Organization (WHO) and the CDC.
The title of this column is the slogan from World AIDS Day 2006, and as we look to 2007 and a new Congress, a more appropriate slogan could not have been chosen. However, rather than keeping the promise, we are only slightly farther ahead than we were 1, 5, 10, or even 20 years ago and at some risk of going backward, as evinced by the sobering information made available through the World Health Organization (WHO) and the CDC.
First, the international perspective:
From a more personal perspective, a recent letter written by Rev Ted Karpf, an Episcopal priest on the staff of the WHO AIDS Programme:
As most readers of this column already know, the problem is not ignorance about what could be done to halt the spread of HIV infection and allow those infected to live productive lives. For some reason, we are unable to make the decision to actÑand sustain that decision long enough to make lasting differences. Although this will be read after the New Year begins, here is a list of New Year reminders that should be taken to Congress as it convenes.
First on the list is the renewal of the Ryan White Act, the subject of the previous Policy Watch (AIDS Reader. 2006;16:593-596). Without this, domestic HIV treatment programs will falter. Renewal of the act without adequate funding will be mere window dressing, however, so the word needs to go to appropriations committees as well as the authorizers.
Second, Congress must remember the interrelationships of programs and adequately support education, housing, jobs, and recreation not only for those struggling to live with HIV infection but also for those at greatest risk of acquiring it. A youngster going to a school without modern textbooks, cramming for standardized tests without being exposed to real teaching, without a safe place to live and play and with no hope of a meaningful adult work life is a time bomb of high-risk behavior and future infection.
Third, Congress must hold the Administration accountable for making policy decisions and appointments that do not fly in the face of science. As a country that was outraged by the South African denial of HIV information, it is even more outrageous that President Bush has nominated Eric Keroack to head the federal government's family planning office. Among other bizarre ideas, he has argued that abortion increases the risk of breast cancer, early abortion is most risky (the reverse of the facts), birth control is demeaning to women, and women who have sex with multiple partners alter their brain chemistry. Congress can use oversight hearings to push Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Michael Levitt to retract this appointment and look carefully at the leadership of all HIV-related units and programs.
Fourth, the funding for international HIV/AIDS work should be sustained and even increased. The distribution of funds should be matched to risk at least as much as to the shifting winds of our preferences for international "friendships" and should meet the same test of science we use–or should use–at home. And we should use our resources to be sure that a solid health infrastructure is built and maintained, rather than cobbling together short-term antiretroviral drug distribution programs that are not sustainable.
We made the promise to stop AIDS a long, long time ago. It is time now to keep the promise, internationally and domestically.
References
1. World Health Organization. HIV/AIDS. Global AIDS epidemic continues to grow. Available at:
http://www.who.int/hiv/mediacentre/news62/en/index.html
. Accessed November 29, 2006.
2. Anderson JE, Mosher WD, Chandra A; National Center for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Measuring HIV risk in the US population aged 15-44: results from Cycle 6 of the National Survey of Family Growth. Adv Data. 2006; 377:1-27. Available at:
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ad/ad377.pdf
. Accessed November 29, 2006.