CHICAGO -- Abnormal fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probe results significantly increase the risk of invasive lung cancer in smokers with severe or moderate dysplasia on bronchial biopsy, researchers reported here.
CHICAGO, Nov. 3 -- Abnormal fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probe results significantly increase the risk of invasive lung cancer in smokers with severe or moderate dysplasia on bronchial biopsy, researchers reported here.
An abnormal FISH analysis was associated with five times the risk of developing invasive lung cancer, said Steinn Jonsson, M.D., of the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center in Aurora, Colo., at the International Society for the Study of Lung Cancer symposium on malignancies of the chest and head and neck.
Not surprisingly when bronchoscopy detected carcinoma in situ the risk was even greater -- a 35-fold increase for invasive lung cancer (OR: 35.2, 95% CI: 5.3-223), he said.
But there was no increased risk associated with angiogenic squamous dysplasia, Dr. Jonsson said.
Dr. Jonsson and colleagues analyzed aneursomy, angiogenesis and histology from bronchial biopsies of 106 smokers (83 men) with a mean age of 63 and a mean smoking history of 62.8 pack years. The population included 83 males and 23 females.
They used 4-color FISH probe targeting centromere 6, 5p15.2, EGFR and CMYC. Three or more copies for two or more of these DNA targets indicated presence of an aneusomic cell.
At the time of biopsy, 30 patients had lung cancer-two incident cases and 28 prevalent cases. Fourteen subjects had carcinoma in situ, 42 had severe dysplasia, and 50 had moderate dysplasia.
FISH analysis was abnormal in 12 patients with mild dysplasia and in 15 with severe dysplasia. Abnormal FISH results were also found in two patients with CIS and 18 patients with lung cancer.
Among patients who were free of lung cancer at the time of the biopsy, an abnormal FISH analysis was associated with an OR of 5.04 for invasive lung cancer (95% OR 1.8-14.5.), which suggested the need for close monitoring of these patients, he said.
3 Reasons Urology Practices Should Add Onsite UTI PCR Labs Under New LCD Rules
March 11th 20251. ONSITE PCR TESTING BRINGS SIGNIFICANT CLINICAL BENEFITS TO A PRACTICE. - ACCURACY Traditional urine cultures can give false-negative results. - SPECIFICITY Accurate microbial identification leads to targeted treatment. - SPEED Same day results vs. 3-5 days for traditional urine cultures - - - ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE MARKERS Improves antimicrobial stewardship 2. MAINTAIN INDEPENDENCE BY INCREASING REVENUE SIGNIFICANTLY THROUGH REVENUE SHIFTING FROM THE REFERENCE LAB TO THE PRACTICE. - Turnkey: Consultation on COLA and CLIA certification, all necessary equipment, standard operating procedures, personnel sourcing and interview, billing and coding training, 3-4 days of onsite training. - Stark Law Compliant: Complies with anti-kickback statutes. - Medicare part B pays at 100%, Med Advantage Plans at 80% - No lab build-out, only 8 linear feet of counter space needed - Z-code procurement for required states 3. BETTER PATIENT CARE LEADS TO BETTER OUTCOMES. - CONVENIENCE Point of care, no third-party referral lab. - TIMELY Results early in the care process. - CORRECT MEDICATION Avoids two trips to the pharmacy. - BETTER OUTCOMES Reduction of recurrent UTI and hospitalizations